“I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm
frightened of the old ones.” This is the famous quotes
from John Cage. This quote reflects the spirit of contemporary art like
Dadaism, Fluxus, abstract art, etc. They have been tried to destroy the
paradigm of previous art. Therefore, they create new world of art and
contemporary art becomes the representative art of 20th century. However, I
assume this innovative paradigm would be changed in 21st century as John Cage's
desire. The artists will make pieces which are very different from contemporary
art.
The
first reason why I strongly believe the change of art is related with
characteristic of contemporary art. People who really enjoy the works of
Dadaism or Fluxus are usually erudite people, especially in the field of art.
They know the background of the art piece such as the movement which the artist
belongs to or the external and internal context of the art piece. They may have
ever read Gombrich's 'the story of art' at least one time. However, most of
people have never studied about art. Therefore, they would just assess the work
with only the work. Of course, the work is great itself but it's difficult to
enjoy the contemporary art without the knowledge about it. It reflects social
hierarchy. This hierarchy will spur the artists to be against with it.
In
addition to educational status, economical status is reflected in the
contemporary work. Jackson Pollock's 'No.5' was sold in 140million dollars. I
don't try to condemn the work but this work was used as a method to show off
the owner's wealth. This trend has been since the art was born. The
contemporary artists who have tried to break a paradigm fail to break the
trend. However, I think the artists of 21th century would change the trend.
This irrationality of contemporary art and good environment like wider
territory of democracy, equal society in the internet would inspire them. 21st
century's artist will make the movement of art which is free from educational
and economical hierarchy.
Another
reason is related with Hegel's dialectic. To make a brief explanation of
Hegel's dialectic, the basic principle is thesis-antithesis-synthesis. Thesis
is an intellectual proposition, antithesis is the negation of thesis, and
synthesis is solution of conflicts between thesis and antithesis by reconciling
them. Comtemporary art is the thesis. Because art is from human's idea, the
history of art has followed dialectic. Therefore, in 21st century, to follow
the dialectic, antithesis and synthesis will appear and the paradigm will be
changed.
In
conclusion, the future is unknown before it becomes the present. However, the
prediction of future reflects the present's reality and hope. After study about
contemporary art, I predict the future of art with some evidences. If art
changes to what I predict, many people will be able to enjoy various art.
Nice essay! Overall structure is well made up. I could read your essay really easily, which means you succeeded writing your essay easily.
답글삭제However, I have a little question. As you mentioned, art is something that have been changed constantly. Latter generation changed the initial one's paradigm. So, why do you think that the change in art is 21st century's typical change?
Interesting essay!
답글삭제The topic of your essay itself was quite a surprise. I highly buy your attempts and tries invested on the topic. It was possible to 'learn' something by reading your essay:) The only thing that I feel sorry throughout the essay is that due to the difficulty and the depth of the topic, the conveyance of the theme seemed to be a bit limited; 600 words were a little short to explain those concepts.
Otherwise, I really enjoyed reading your essay!